Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Senior Health Dashboard

This dashboard shows data related to senior health in Washtenaw County. A senior is defined as a person aged 65 years or older.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Cancer: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Cancer: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Cancer: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Cancer: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (11.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.0%.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Mammography Screening: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 49.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 50.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 50.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (50.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (47.0%).
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Adults with Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Diabetes County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults with Diabetes County: Washtenaw

9.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (11.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Diabetes: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Diabetes: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (25.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (20.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (20.0%).
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Diabetes

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

85.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 85.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 85.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (88.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 85.2% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (87.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 85.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (85.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (88.8%).
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

14.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (15.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.9% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Value
Compared to:

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults who have had a Routine Checkup County: Washtenaw

69.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (77.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 69.8% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (69.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (72.1%).
Prior Value
(72.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Medicare Healthcare Costs

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Medicare Healthcare Costs

Value
Compared to:

Medicare Healthcare Costs County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Medicare Healthcare Costs County: Washtenaw

$9,338
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value ($10,317), Washtenaw has a value of $9,338.
MI Value
($10,317)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($9,729), Washtenaw has a value of $9,338.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw ($9,338) is greater  than the previously measured value ($9,156).
Prior Value
($9,156)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

2,909
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2,909 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,449 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,880.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 2,909 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,375.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (3,261), Washtenaw has a value of 2,909 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(3,261)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677), Washtenaw has a value of 2,909 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2,909) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,043).
Prior Value
(3,043)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Persons with an Internet Subscription

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

Persons with an Internet Subscription

Value
Compared to:

Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Persons with an Internet Subscription County: Washtenaw

94.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 94.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (90.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(90.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 94.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Adults who Have been Told They Had a Heart Attack

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Adults who Have been Told They Had a Heart Attack

Value
Compared to:

Adults who Have been Told They Had a Heart Attack County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults who Have been Told They Had a Heart Attack County: Washtenaw

2.6%
% of adults
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (2.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.5%).
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (15.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (13.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.0%).
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Heart Failure: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Value
Compared to:

High Blood Pressure Prevalence County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

High Blood Pressure Prevalence County: Washtenaw

23.1%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (35.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 23.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (23.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (23.7%).
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 52.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (62.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 52.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 52.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (52.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Hypertension: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Hypertension: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Hypertension: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

57.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (66.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 57.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 57.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (57.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (56.0%).
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (22.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (17.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Stroke: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Stroke: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Stroke: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination County: Washtenaw

80.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (72.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 80.3% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 80.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(67.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (80.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (76.6%).
Prior Value
(76.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination County: Washtenaw

75.6%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (72.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(72.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.6% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (75.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (75.9%).
Prior Value
(75.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

54.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 54.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (47.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 54.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (54.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (57.0%).
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Depression: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Depression: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Depression: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 19.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (18.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 19.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (19.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Value
Compared to:

Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption County: Washtenaw

16.6%
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.6% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.4%).
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females County: Washtenaw

44.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 44.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 39.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 44.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 44.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males County: Washtenaw

51.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 51.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 43.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 51.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 51.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with a Disability

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Disability County: Washtenaw

27.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (32.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 27.9%.
MI Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 27.9%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty County: Washtenaw

11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (13.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.6%.
MI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.6%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty County: Washtenaw

5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.5%.
MI Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty County: Washtenaw

3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (5.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.3%.
MI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty County: Washtenaw

10.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.6%.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 10.6%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Health / Older Adults

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease County: Washtenaw

38.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 38.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.7.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 79 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (34.4), Washtenaw has a value of 38.4 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Washtenaw has a value of 38.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (38.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.2).
Prior Value
(38.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Older Adults

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0%.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Value
Compared to:

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss County: Washtenaw

7.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (12.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Adults with Arthritis

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Adults with Arthritis

Value
Compared to:

Adults with Arthritis County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults with Arthritis County: Washtenaw

23.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (30.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 23.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (23.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.7%).
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (19.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 17.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (17.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Osteoporosis: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (10.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (13.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 32.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (36.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 32.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (32.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.0%).
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Adults who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

Adults who are Sedentary

Value
Compared to:

Adults who are Sedentary County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Adults who are Sedentary County: Washtenaw

14.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (22.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Asthma: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Asthma: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0%.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Respiratory Diseases

COPD: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

COPD: Medicare Population

Value
Compared to:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

COPD: Medicare Population County: Washtenaw

8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Population Over Age 65

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

Population Over Age 65

Value
Compared to:

Population Over Age 65 County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Population Over Age 65 County: Washtenaw

16.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (19.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.5%.
MI Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.5%.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

Population Over Age 65 (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Population Over Age 65 (Count) County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Population Over Age 65 (Count) County: Washtenaw

54,677
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

People 65+ Living Alone

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

People 65+ Living Alone

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone County: Washtenaw

26.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 26.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (28.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 26.4%.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

People 65+ Living Alone (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Alone (Count) County: Washtenaw

14,461
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent County: Washtenaw

53.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 53.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level County: Washtenaw

6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Value
Compared to:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Washtenaw

Current Value:

People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count) County: Washtenaw

3,305
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV