Search for Indicators
All Data
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults who Binge Drink
County: Washtenaw Adults who Binge Drink
17.4%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(17.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(16.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults who Drink Excessively
County: Washtenaw Adults who Drink Excessively
17.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate
21.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 44 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,303 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(26.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washtenaw Annual Opioid Hospitalizations
County: Washtenaw Annual Opioid Hospitalizations
24
Hospitalizations
(2019)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(49)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Washtenaw Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
20.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 60 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(27.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washtenaw Death Rate due to Opioid-Related Drug Poisoning
County: Washtenaw Death Rate due to Opioid-Related Drug Poisoning
19.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(25.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(16.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Misuse of Drugs
County: Washtenaw Misuse of Drugs
5.1%
% of adults
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washtenaw Opioid Prescriptions Dispensed
County: Washtenaw Opioid Prescriptions Dispensed
3,815.3
Prescriptions per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6,630.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(3,801.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Teens who Binge Drink: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Washtenaw Teens who Binge Drink: 9th, 11th Graders
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(11.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
10.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(25.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Teens who Use Marijuana: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Washtenaw Teens who Use Marijuana: 9th, 11th Graders
7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(21.6% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Cancer
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults with Cancer
County: Washtenaw Adults with Cancer
6.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Adults with Cancer (Non-Skin) or Melanoma
County: Washtenaw Adults with Cancer (Non-Skin) or Melanoma
7.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
22.4
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,778 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(20.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(19.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
134.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(158.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(146.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(139.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
11.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,180 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
27.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,746 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(38.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(32.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
18.2
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,612 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: Washtenaw All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washtenaw All Cancer Incidence Rate
422.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,931 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(441.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(444.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(428.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washtenaw Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
136.4
Cases per 100,000 females
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,712 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(129.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(130.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Cancer: Medicare Population
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Washtenaw Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
81.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening
County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening
75.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(75.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(72.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Washtenaw Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
70.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washtenaw Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
29.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 80 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,613 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(35.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(36.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washtenaw Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
43.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,711 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(58.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(53.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(45.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Washtenaw Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
78.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(76.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Washtenaw Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
50.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washtenaw Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
11.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,869 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(11.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Pap Test in Past 3 Years
County: Washtenaw Pap Test in Past 3 Years
63.0%
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
MI Value
(79.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(79.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washtenaw Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
125.2
Cases per 100,000 males
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,728 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(114.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(113.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(128.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Children's Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Child Mortality Rate: Under 20
County: Washtenaw Child Mortality Rate: Under 20
39.7
Deaths per 100,000 population under 20
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 60 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,859 U.S. counties and county equivalents. Counties in Idaho, Kentucky, and Oklahoma are excluded due to incomparable data between each other and the rest of the country.
MI Value
(54.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(50.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Number of Children Under Age 6 Tested for Blood Lead Level
County: Washtenaw Number of Children Under Age 6 Tested for Blood Lead Level
2,043
Number of Children (Under Age 6)
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2,315)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Number of Children Under Age 6 with an Elevated Blood Lead Level
County: Washtenaw Number of Children Under Age 6 with an Elevated Blood Lead Level
53
Number of Children (Under Age 6)
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(38)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Percent of Children Under Age 6 Tested for Blood Lead Level
County: Washtenaw Percent of Children Under Age 6 Tested for Blood Lead Level
9.7%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan state value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Percent of Children Under Age 6 Tested with an Elevated Blood Lead Level
County: Washtenaw Percent of Children Under Age 6 Tested with an Elevated Blood Lead Level
2.6%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan state value.
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / County Health Rankings
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Clinical Care Ranking
County: Washtenaw Clinical Care Ranking
2
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Washtenaw Health Behaviors Ranking
County: Washtenaw Health Behaviors Ranking
1
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Washtenaw Morbidity Ranking
County: Washtenaw Morbidity Ranking
17
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Washtenaw Mortality Ranking
County: Washtenaw Mortality Ranking
5
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Washtenaw Physical Environment Ranking
County: Washtenaw Physical Environment Ranking
38
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Washtenaw Social and Economic Factors Ranking
County: Washtenaw Social and Economic Factors Ranking
5
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Diabetes
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults with Diabetes
County: Washtenaw Adults with Diabetes
9.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(11.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.5% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
10.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(26.1)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(11.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Diabetes: Medicare Population
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Diabetic Monitoring: Medicare Population
85.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,097 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(88.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(87.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(88.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Disabilities
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Washtenaw Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
22.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Children with a Disability
County: Washtenaw Children with a Disability
4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Disability
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Disability
10.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
1.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Persons with a Vision Difficulty
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
4.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Veterans with a Disability
County: Washtenaw Veterans with a Disability
30.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(31.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(29.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Family Planning
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: Washtenaw Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
3.5
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(3.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Teen Pregnancy Rate
County: Washtenaw Teen Pregnancy Rate
9.0
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
County: Washtenaw Teens who are Sexually Active: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Washtenaw Teens who are Sexually Active: 9th, 11th Graders
15.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw 30-Day Hospital Readmission Rate: Medicare Population
14.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(14.9% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Washtenaw Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
69.8%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(72.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care
County: Washtenaw Adults with a Usual Source of Health Care
88.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(87.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(84.0% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(88.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults with Health Insurance
County: Washtenaw Adults with Health Insurance
95.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(95.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults without Health Insurance
County: Washtenaw Adults without Health Insurance
4.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Children with Health Insurance
County: Washtenaw Children with Health Insurance
98.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(97.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(94.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(97.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Medicare Healthcare Costs
County: Washtenaw Medicare Healthcare Costs
$9,338
Dollars per enrollee
(2015)
Compared to:
MI Value
($10,317)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
($9,729)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
($9,156)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Washtenaw Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
377
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(141)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(343)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with Health Insurance
County: Washtenaw Persons with Health Insurance
95.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(94.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(94.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washtenaw Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Washtenaw Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
67.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(54.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(67.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Washtenaw Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
15.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(25.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
2,909
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(3,261)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,043)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Washtenaw Primary Care Provider Rate
178
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(78)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(176)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Health Information Technology
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Washtenaw Households with an Internet Subscription
93.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(88.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: Washtenaw Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
97.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(93.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Washtenaw Persons with an Internet Subscription
94.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(90.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Washtenaw Adults who Experienced a Stroke
2.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Washtenaw Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
5.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Adults who Have been Told They Had a Heart Attack
County: Washtenaw Adults who Have been Told They Had a Heart Attack
2.6%
% of adults
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washtenaw Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Washtenaw Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
75.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
39.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(44.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(40.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
45.0
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,101 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(48.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(46.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
152.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(205.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(157.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack
31.7
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(30.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(38.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Cholesterol Test History
County: Washtenaw Cholesterol Test History
84.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Heart Failure: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Washtenaw High Blood Pressure Prevalence
23.1%
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(32.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Washtenaw High Cholesterol Prevalence
County: Washtenaw High Cholesterol Prevalence
28.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,066 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(35.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Washtenaw High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
27.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Hypertension: Medicare Population
57.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(56.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Influenza Vaccination
80.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(67.8% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(76.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Pneumonia Vaccination
75.6%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(72.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(71.6% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(75.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
6.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(7.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Washtenaw COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
0.4
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(3.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Washtenaw COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
8.71
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(10.52)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
54.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(57.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Immunization Status of 19 to 35-Month-Old Children
County: Washtenaw Immunization Status of 19 to 35-Month-Old Children
70.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(66.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(71.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases
County: Washtenaw Newly Diagnosed HIV Cases
14
# of individuals
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
County: Washtenaw Persons Fully Vaccinated Against COVID-19
74.3%
(May 10, 2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(74.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Washtenaw County Pertussis Data
County: Washtenaw Washtenaw County Pertussis Data
1
Number of Pertussis Cases
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Washtenaw Babies with Low Birthweight
7.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(9.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Infant Mortality Rate
County: Washtenaw Infant Mortality Rate
5.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(5.5 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(5.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washtenaw Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Washtenaw Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
80.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(78.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
County: Washtenaw Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
4.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(5.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
County: Washtenaw Mothers who Were a Healthy Weight Before Pregnancy
County: Washtenaw Mothers who Were a Healthy Weight Before Pregnancy
47.5%
% of women
(2017)
Compared to:
MI Value
(39.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2020 Target
(57.8%)
HP 2030 Target
(47.1%)
County: Washtenaw Preterm Births
County: Washtenaw Preterm Births
8.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
County: Washtenaw WIC Enrollment Data
County: Washtenaw WIC Enrollment Data
5,093
Persons
(July 2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(4,975)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw WIC Redemptions Per Capita
County: Washtenaw WIC Redemptions Per Capita
$7.3
(2016)
Compared to:
Prior Value
($8.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Washtenaw Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
24.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(20.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
11.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 61 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(14.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(11.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washtenaw Depression: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Depression: Medicare Population
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Frequent Mental Distress
County: Washtenaw Frequent Mental Distress
13.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washtenaw Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Washtenaw Mental Health Provider Rate
714
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(336)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(652)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Washtenaw Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
15.5%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(16.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
County: Washtenaw Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
5.2
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(5.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Suicide Completions
County: Washtenaw Suicide Completions
45
Number of completions
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(47)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
37.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(36.4% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Mortality Data
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Life Expectancy
County: Washtenaw Life Expectancy
80.4
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(76.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Premature Death
County: Washtenaw Premature Death
5,624.1
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(8,467.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
County: Washtenaw Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
16.6%
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
MI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washtenaw Adults who Eat Fast Food More Than Once per Week
County: Washtenaw Adults who Eat Fast Food More Than Once per Week
14.6%
% of adults
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washtenaw Child Low Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
County: Washtenaw Child Low Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
16.0%
%
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washtenaw Children who Drink No Sweetened Beverages
County: Washtenaw Children who Drink No Sweetened Beverages
82.6%
% of children
(2015)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(68.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
23.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Teens who Drank Soda or Pop in the Last Week: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Washtenaw Teens who Drank Soda or Pop in the Last Week: 9th, 11th Graders
9.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(14.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Older Adults
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
44.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
51.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Disability
27.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
10.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
County: Washtenaw Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
38.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 79 Michigan counties.
MI Value
(34.4)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(38.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
(2021)
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Oral Health
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Washtenaw Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
7.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Washtenaw Adults who Visited a Dentist
72.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(63.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Children Enrolled in Medicaid who Visited the Dentist the Past Year
County: Washtenaw Children Enrolled in Medicaid who Visited the Dentist the Past Year
50.6%
%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(49.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
State of Michigan Target
(70%)
<div>This target is set forth by the State of Michigan. </div>
County: Washtenaw Dentist Rate
County: Washtenaw Dentist Rate
207
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(80)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(198)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Medicaid Enrollees who Visited the Dentist in the Last Year
County: Washtenaw Medicaid Enrollees who Visited the Dentist in the Last Year
29.2%
%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
23.8%
%
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Other Conditions
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults with Arthritis
County: Washtenaw Adults with Arthritis
23.2%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Prior Value
(21.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Washtenaw Adults with Kidney Disease
2.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washtenaw Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Washtenaw Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
MI Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washtenaw
Health / Physical Activity
Value
Compared to:
County: Washtenaw Adults who are Sedentary
County: Washtenaw Adults who are Sedentary
14.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
US Value
(23.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
County: Washtenaw Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity: 9th, 11th Graders
County: Washtenaw Teens who Engage in Regular Physical Activity: 9th, 11th Graders
63.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
MI Value
(44.7% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Prior Value
(59.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
