Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Food Insecurity Dashboard

Resource Collection: Women, Infants, & Children (WIC) Clinics

Type Title Address
Community Resources

Main Ypsilanti WIC Office

555 Towner Street
Ypsilanti, MI 48198

Community Resources

Ann Arbor Preschool (Head Start) WIC Clinic

2775 Boardwalk
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Community Resources

Calvary Methodist Church WIC Clinic

1415 Miller Ave.
Ann Arbor, MI 48103

Community Resources

Community Mental Health WIC Clinic

2140 Ellsworth Rd.
Ann Arbor, MI 48108

Community Resources

Manchester Emanuel United Church WIC Clinic

324 W. Main St.
Manchester, MI 48158

Community Resources

Ypsilanti Head Start WIC Clinic

1661 Leforge Rd.
Ypsilanti, MI 48198

Resource Collection: Washtenaw County Farmers Markets

Type Title Address
Community Resources

Agricole Farm Stop

118 N Main St., Chelsea, MI 48118

Community Resources

Ann Arbor Farmers Market

315 Detroit St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Community Resources

Argus Farm Stop

325 W Liberty St., Ann Arbor, MI 48103

Community Resources

Chelsea Saturday Farmers Market

304 S. Main St., Chelsea, MI 48118

Community Resources

Chelsea Wednesday Farmers Market

1010 S. Main St., Chelsea, MI 48118

Community Resources

Chelsea Winter Market

500 Washington St., Chelsea, MI 48118

Community Resources

Dexter Farmers Market

3233 Alpine St., Dexter, MI 48130

Community Resources

Dexter Winter Marketplace

7643 Huron River Drive, Dexter, MI 48130

Community Resources

Dixboro Farmers Market

5221 Church St., Ann Arbor, MI 48105

Community Resources

Manchester / Acorn Farmers Market

327 W. Main Street, Manchester, MI 48158

Community Resources

Pittsfield Townshp Farmers Market

W. Michigan Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48108

Community Resources

Saline Indoor Winter Market

7265 Ann Arbor Rd., Saline, MI 48176

Community Resources

Saline Saturday Farmers Market

S. Ann Arbor St., Saline, MI 48176

Community Resources

Westside Farmers' Market

2501 Jackson Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48103

Community Resources

Ypsi Area Tuesday Online Market

16 S. Washington St Ypsilanti, MI, 48197

Community Resources

Ypsi Area Wednesday Online Market

5301 McAuley Dr., Ypsilanti, MI 48197

Community Resources

Ypsilanti Depot Town Market

100 Rice St., Ypsilanti, MI 48198

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Washtenaw

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw WIC Enrollment Data

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw WIC Enrollment Data

5,093
Persons
(July 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5,093) is greater  than the previously measured value (4,975).
Prior Value
(4,975)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw WIC Redemptions Per Capita

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw WIC Redemptions Per Capita

$7.3
(2016)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw ($7.3) is less and worse than the previously measured value ($8.5).
Prior Value
($8.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adult Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
16.6%
(2013-2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.6% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.4%).
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Adults who Eat Fast Food More Than Once per Week

Current Value:
14.6%
% of adults
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.9%).
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Child Low Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

Current Value:
16.0%
%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.9%).
Prior Value
(12.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Children who Drink No Sweetened Beverages

Current Value:
82.6%
% of children
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (82.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (68.4%).
Prior Value
(68.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Ate Five or More Servings of Fruits and Vegetables: 9th, 11th Graders

23.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (23.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (29.5%).
Prior Value
(29.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Teens who Drank Soda or Pop in the Last Week: 9th, 11th Graders

9.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(14.2% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults who are Sedentary

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults who are Sedentary

14.7%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (22.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (23.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 14.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.4% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)

County: Washtenaw

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults Who Are Obese

27.3%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (34.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(34.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.6% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (27.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (27.3%).
Prior Value
(27.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Adults who are Overweight

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Adults who are Overweight

30.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (33.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 30.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(34.1% in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (30.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.2%).
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Children Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Children Who Are Obese

11.8%
% of children ages 2-17 yrs
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (11.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.4%).
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2020 Target (14.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2020 Target
(14.5%)
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.5%)
<div>The national Healthy People 2030 target is for children and adolescents aged 2-19 years. </div>

County: Washtenaw Teens who are Obese: 9th, 11th Graders

Current Value:
9.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (15.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(15.3% in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the 2019 Michigan state value for 9th - 12th graders.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.9%).
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Average Household Size

2.40
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (2.50), Washtenaw has a value of 2.40.
MI Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Washtenaw has a value of 2.40.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Foreign Born Persons

12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.4%.
MI Value
(6.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Households

148,704
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population American Indian and Alaska Native

Current Value:
0.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (0.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.4%.
MI Value
(0.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.4%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (0.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.4%).
Prior Value
(0.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Asian

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Asian

9.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (3.6%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.6%.
MI Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 9.6%.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (9.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (9.3%).
Prior Value
(9.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Black or African American

Current Value:
12.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.3%.
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.3%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (12.3%) is less  than the previously measured value (12.4%).
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Hispanic or Latino

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Hispanic or Latino

5.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.8%.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 5.8%.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (5.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander

0.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (0.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.1%.
MI Value
(0.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 0.1%.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (0.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.1%).
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Over Age 65

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Over Age 65

16.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (19.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.5%.
MI Value
(19.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 16.5%.
US Value
(17.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (16.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (15.8%).
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Two or More Races

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Two or More Races

3.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (2.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.9%.
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 3.9%.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (3.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Under Age 18

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Under Age 18

18.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (21.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 18.0%.
MI Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 18.0%.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (18.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (18.2%).
Prior Value
(18.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population Under Age 5

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population Under Age 5

4.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (5.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.4%.
MI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 4.4%.
US Value
(5.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (4.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (4.6%).
Prior Value
(4.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population White

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Population White

73.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (78.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 73.7%.
MI Value
(78.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.3%), Washtenaw has a value of 73.7%.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (73.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (74.0%).
Prior Value
(74.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)

Current Value:
68.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (73.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 68.9%.
MI Value
(73.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.4%), Washtenaw has a value of 68.9%.
US Value
(58.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (68.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (69.2%).
Prior Value
(69.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Total Population

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Total Population

365,536
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (365,536) is less  than the previously measured value (366,504).
Prior Value
(366,504)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Child Food Insecurity Rate

12.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 12.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (17.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(17.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (12.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.8%).
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
8.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.1%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (16.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 8.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.5%).
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Food Insecurity Rate

12.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (14.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (12.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9.6%).
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Projected Food Insecurity Rate

11.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (14.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (11.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.2%).
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Adults in Family Reduced Food Intake Due to Cost

Current Value:
7.2%
% of adults in family
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (7.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
31.6%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.5%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 31.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(49.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 31.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (31.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.6%).
Prior Value
(29.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
42.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (43.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 42.2%.
MI Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Washtenaw has a value of 42.2%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Households Receiving SNAP with Children (Count)

Current Value:
4,540
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Government Assistance

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw SNAP Benefits Per Capita

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw SNAP Benefits Per Capita

$10.1
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw ($10.1) is less  than the previously measured value ($15.2).
Prior Value
($15.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Households with Children

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Households with Children

36,610
Households
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (36,610) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (36,961).
Prior Value
(36,961)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washtenaw Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (8.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Washtenaw has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level (Count)

Current Value:
3,305
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
74.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (70.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(70.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Washtenaw has a value of 74.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Washtenaw has a value of 13.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Washtenaw Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
11.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 11.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (20.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Washtenaw has a value of 11.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Washtenaw Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Food Environment Index

8.2
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 7.2.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.2), Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is higher and better.
MI Value
(7.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Washtenaw has a value of 8.2 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (8.2) is greater and better than the previously measured value (8.1).
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washtenaw Liquor Store Density

Current Value:

County: Washtenaw Liquor Store Density

14.7
Stores per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 14.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.3.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 53 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washtenaw has a value of 14.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,516 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (15.7), Washtenaw has a value of 14.7 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(15.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.9), Washtenaw has a value of 14.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washtenaw (14.7) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.3).
Prior Value
(14.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washtenaw value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.